Systems With Reliability

About Us
- History
- Images
- Bios
- Timeline
- Our Staff
- Projects

SWR Products
- Illumitron
- Illumitron HD
- FM Antennas
- FM1 Antennas
- UHF Antennas
- VHF Antennas

Online Catalog
Engineering
- Engineering Info
- FAQ
- Questionnaire
- Downloads
- Help Formulae
- Field Service

Contact Us
 
Home Page
Antennas Transmission Systems

Engineering Help Formulae

Sensitivity of antenna amplitude gain determination:

Assume we have an interferometer with N antennas. We want to determine the power gain of antenna i, by observing a point source of flux density S.

The quantities we measure are the baseline amplitudes: Let us note the amplitude of the correlation product of the outputs of antennas i and j.

One has: which may be written, since the power gains are positive:

where , and . We thus have N (N-1) linear equations to solve for the N unknowns . Such a system is usually solved using the method of least squares. One minimizes:

for which the N conditions are:

which may be rewritten as:

Adding these equations one obtains:

It is then straightforward to substitute this back and get:

Here the second term contains all the baseline amplitudes. This formula is derived in a much more elegant way (and in French) by E. Anterrieu ([1992]). Let's rewrite it in a slightly different way:

Now the first term contains all baselines connected to antenna i, the second one contains all the other baselines; for instance for 3 antennas, one obtains the well-known formula:

Now all the contain noise terms which are uncorrelated. Then for the corresponding r.m.s. fluctuations we get:

In the large signal-to-noise limit: , . Let us assume further that all antennas have the same gain and sensitivity: :




The rms of the power gain is thus behaving like in the large N limit. This is because in Eq.1 the first (N-1) terms are going to dominate the summation when N is large, since the other (N-1)(N-2)/2 are multiplied by a factor. The rms gain also diverges for N <3: it is well-known that it is not possible to measure the gain of a single antenna in a two-element interferometer. This formula slightly differs from that of Cornwell and Fomalont ([1989]); the asymptotic behaviour is the same ( for the amplitude gains) but their result diverges for N=3.

In the case of heterogeneous arrays the previous analysis has to be refined; We do this in Appendix A. The result for a large number of antennas is simply:
where is the gain of kind 1 , the rms in one baseline connecting two antennas of kind 1, and A is the total collecting area of the array.

Formulae by Prof. Syed Idris Syed Hassan,
Universiti Sains Malaysia, Serak

Misc. Formulae

wavelength = 11803 / frequency
i.e.:
11803 / 107.9 = 109.38832 (spacing of antennas)
107.9 / 4 = 27.34708 (quater-wave spacing)

directivity = max. power radiated / unit solid angle / tl. power radiated / 4 pi

gain = max. power radiated / unit solid angle / tl power delivered to antenna / 4 pi
(waveguide)

Determination of half-power beamwidth:
.707 = cosn dia.
where:
dia. = half-power beam width
n = cos # for either h or e plane

AMPS * VOLTS = WATTS
WATTS / 746 = HORSEPOWER



Systems With Reliability, Inc.
619 Industrial Park Road
Ebensburg, PA 15931 USA

toll free: 800-762-7743
tel: 814-472-5436
fax: 814-472-5552


Antenna Manufacturer

 
Employment
 
Map/Location
 
Help

- Governor's Excellence Award

- 1999 NAB Booth Exhibits

- International Language Translations




We accept: Visa, Mastercard and American Express.